By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 19 May 2014
Edit Thread
oniyide said:
DonFerrari said:

All digital for the same price on SW? No way in hell, by 40% less on ALL SW on release and cuts accompanying the retailers, probably would be more sucessfull.

but see that wasnt going to happen, they would have charged the same. Not saying your idea wouldnt work however.


Yes we know that, just see the PSN and Live, they usually charge the same for retail or digital which is ludicrous and make me buy just under 10 bucks PSN games. Preffer to buy used and cheap games physical than pay a lot more for pieces of data that I often have to erase because my PS3 don't have enough space in the HDD. There I have plenty of PS+ games, some classics, indies and installs/saves I would never buy a retail game for like more than 30% of the price digitally. And I love to have my shelfes full of discs.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."