Imaginedvl said:
Yah because Kinect and Nokia is the only thing Microsoft is working on, right? Or because they are buying a tech/company definitely mean they are not investing at all on R&D to develop those techs? You must certainly believe they bought Kinect 2 from scratch and not just some patent/techs and then developped/invested/iterated on it to come with an totaly different final product? As far as the "quality" of the products, I believe you need to check the reviews of Microsoft products (in general, including software) and you'll see that the quality is here. They are winning a LOT of quality awards but at the same time being the biggest (in software at least), they are also getting more shit and scrutinity from the Internet which lead to people like you who take their oppinion or perception as a "global" indication of Microsoft's product quality. Of course you can name failures like the first Xbox 360 etc... But you quickly forget the PS1/PS2 DVD drive failure rate and other thing like that and point out Microsoft only. Microsoft hardware is generaly very good and top quality by the way (for a software company). This shit about Microsoft "only" buying other companies and not being innovative is a so out of place and what of the most laughable arguments while trying to trash about Microsoft... |
As I live and breathe I just bought a Windows mobile phone and it died on me for no apparent reason. No more American made products for me outside of Apple. I switched to LG. LOL @ quality. Their phones dont even have proper apps. The only value their WIndows mobile phones give are the cameras outside of being integrated to the Xbox. Thats not really that big of a deal. Apple does it better.







