So basically it has come down to Macs being better for
A) the super high end user, who uses it for intense processing, scientific research, etc.
B) laptop users.
Well hell, I would have agreed on that point a long time ago, but that's assuming I wouldn't want to use my laptop for gaming either.
Apparently most Mac users are MacBook users, and so no sh*t they don't want to play games on a laptop; I wouldn't either.
But I love my desktop, and it's awesome for videogames...I'd say a lot of you don't know what you're missing.
And yeah, this:
"How about this for an example. let's say I built the fastest gaming rig in the world, and sold it for $800, and there was a forum where people who just sent emails and browsed the web talked about the best PC for that task. If they bashed my $800 gaming rig as way over priced because they could do everything they needed on a $350 computer, would they be right?
No. It's still an awesome gaming rig for less then any other gaming rig on the market. If Apple released a computer designed for gaming, and it was overpriced, I would understand."
Apple releases computers designed for general computing use. They typically have ?notsure? dual-cores, a fairly decent graphics card, a generally easy-to-use OS, enough memory, enough hard drive space, etc. AND YOU CAN GET ALL THAT FOR MUCH CHEAPER by building your own PC; and not just an average PC; you could build an awesome PC gaming rig for much less than the general Mac.
So it's not "oh, I don't need the stuff that your Mac has, so it's overpriced!" It's "I HAVE MORE THAN YOUR MAC, and MY PC COST MUCH MUCH LESS!"
You had it backwards, my friend.


LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release. (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )







