By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Farsala said:
jlmurph2 said:

No, not #1, if you meant #1 then you wouldn't have said "back on top" in your post. I mean it's usually in the top 10


I am pretty sure it has been #1 before at least on launch about a year ago. It is obvious that it is consistently in the top 10.


Point being that even though it drops a little bit weekly, it is now at #1. Meaning the base is extremely low, hence sales are dead.


So you're talking about individual then? I was talking about the article up top that says "Titanfall NO 1". My mistake.