Hmmmm... You left quite a bit out of Sonys conference and Microsofts. You're pretty much just mocking them. MS and Sony had third parties, second party and first party present, which at this current state Nintendo cannot contest. Even if Microsoft didnt develop most of their games they still came at the ready titles in hand. X is not a big time game and neither is Bayonetta...so I have no clue why you boast like it is. I will enjoy it when I buy it, but more people are salivating over FFXV than X. At this rate FFXV itself will boost console sales for Sony in Japan and the west and MS in the west.
Well it's always a bit easier to boast when you get exclusives. Just saying...
If it wasnt for Nintendo Bayonetta would've ceased to exist. No third party in the west is playing ball with Nintendo because they refused to make contact with them about their system specs before the gen started (thus hammering home the fact that Nintendo only thinks about their own vision when they make their consoles). Their only option was a Japanese company who could make a semi-last gen game without any complaints.
I mean..this parody says it all.
Lol, one question, what does this have to do with last years E3? Hold on let me re-read your comment. Yeah.... Nothing, I thought so.
It has everything to do with last years E3 event. Nintendo didnt have enough content to fill the usual hour and thirty minutes like MS and Sony. Sony showed hardware, service expansions and games and Microsoft mostly showed games while giving an updated preview of the Xbox One and reversal of the DRM issues. Nintendo only had 40+ minutes worth of content to show epople. Thats basically half of Microsoft and Sony's show. If you have a bias to Nintendo thats perfectly fine. I think Nintendo knew they would be void of content so they planned to trim the fat and spend less money on a major production. In essence, no point in even going into a head on battle with MS and Sony to see who had the best E3 conference.
