Captain_Tom on 10 May 2014
| fireblazerx17 said: 1. Graphics: GC was pretty advanced for its time, competing with both PS2 and Xbox for best graphics output at the time. In contrast, Wii U is a generation behind the PS4 and XB1. not true 3. Third party support: GC had pretty strong support with Capcom releasing some of the best RE games ever. While it didn't have as much support as the competition, it still had publisher interest. In contrast; third party support is all but dead on the Wii U. not true 5. First party titles: I personally didn't like Mario Sunshine, I thought it was really boring. I know Zelda was also controversial but later received a cult following which led to the re-release on Wii U. Metroid was also a stellar title. So far it's too early to tell what the quality will be on the Wii U but I know many have praised Mario world. I doubt we'll see two new Zelda games like on the GC and I also doubt we'll see any new Metroid. I think the GC will probably come ahead as the winner here in the future. ??? this is literally just speculation/opinion |
So you think the Wii U is comparible to next gen consoles or that the Gamecube was behind the PS2? Neithe of those are true. The Wii U has the equivalent of a $40 GPU, the Xbox One has a $100 GPU, and the PS4 has a $180 GPU. No, the Wii U can't even come close to the other's performance...
