Insominiac biting the feeding hand?

[Machiavellian]

DonFerrari said:

J_Allard said:

DonFerrari said:

If of course financials were the bigger part and then IP ownership, and both are kept out and just summarized as "MS is better partner then Sony" how can you say they were precise?

Previously feeding hand just if they decide not to keep releasing content financed by Sony.

Who knows how big a piece of the pie financials were. How much more precise can they be than saying MS gave them a better deal?

They can partner with Sony for another R&C game and it is irrelevant to this project. MS is the feeding hand here.

More precise saying not that they partnered with MS because they are great partners but because they were the only willing to support them in their terms? (If they decide not to say about the finances specific).

I'll repeat that my only problem in his comment was when asked why the game won't release on PS4 and the answer being because MS are terrific partners. Maybe that was taken out of context or the guy rushed to answer, but certainly seems disrespectful.

Actually it might not be taken out of context and means exactly what you think.  Sony might not have been a great partner to them and did not give them the freedom them wanted.  MS offered them what they wanted which would make them the better partner.  As I have seen, Console makers treat each developer different and it could be a case where IS was not happy under Sony.  It's notdisrespectful it could be the truth for them.  No one knows what goes on between a lot of these dev companies and the console maker.