Mr Puggsly said:
Returning backwards compatibility would be fantastic, but letting us play old discs doesn't benefit them financially and that's why they're opting for a cloud service. The cloud games will probably be running on software based emulators as well. Right, I wasn't presuming you felt Sony was going to do this. I was just pointing out full backward compatibility would be unlikely, they would opt for software emulation because its cheaper. |
Well I would agree with you that they probably would opt to just shrink it and make it cheaper without compatibility and keep PSNow... but being a company trying to profit wouldn't doubt a way to "enable" software simulation by paying a fee (because some markets the PSNow will take several years to kick in).
I would like a retrocompatible PS3, just wouldn't buy because I just collect the "first models" (chassi) of my consoles (they usually are prettier).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







