DonFerrari on 09 May 2014
| DolPhanTendo said: This makes absolute sense to me. If you are being serious, and the Wii U is now not taking a loss this is good thing and now they can just concentrate on games for the system in the future. And I also agree with the quote its a marathon not a sprint. Game consoles are now going to have a longer life due to DLC and power of the systems. Look at the PS4 and PS3 not much difference graphically the only thing that is impressive on the upgrade are the loading times, but that's it. Nintendo took hit last year because Iwata s over confidence , nothing more. I easily couldof told you no way they make what he projected unless he over paid in advertising like Sony did. |
You do realize that the jump from Xbox original for X360 wasn't big on the games released on the release of the console right? So you can expect to keep seeing X1 and PS4 games get better graphics over time, not that this is the problem with the WiiU.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
