By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
gergroy on 06 May 2014
Edit Thread
GribbleGrunger said:
Talal said:


Fair enough then, but as soon as Amazon gets a month wrong you will admit that it isn't proof?

As long as Amazon stays 100% I guess it can be used for "proof" but when it gets a month wrong it's an "indication" not proof.

So your ratio for proving something is wrong is once out of never? I'd suggest 'once' would be an anomaly and doesn't in any way prove the theory wrong.


Ethomaz only has like 4 months of data that he is going off of.  So if it is wrong next month, for example, his percentage would go down from 100% to 80%.  Thats a big drop. There is not enough data for one wrong month to be considered an anomaly.  

Plus, talal said it would become an indication instead of absolute proof, which is true.  You cant be 100% without always being right.  Maybe once he has some more months to back it up, but it wont happen.  Soon there will be too many bundles out there and it will be impossible to keep track of every system sold on amazon.  

As it is, it is just an theory that lacks enough evidence to substantiate it.  So people will just bicker back and forth about it...