| naznatips said: Uh, actually kergeten many PC games (including Crysis) are extremely well optimized for GRAPHICS CARDS. RAM is a whole different beast, and a completely uncomparable process as RAM is used for more than running games on PCs. Not all PC games are well optimized, but Crysis is one that is, and it can't be run on max without at least an 8800GT. The PS3 runs a modified 7800GT. It would run it on medium at 30 FPS and 720p at best. There would most likely be signifficant slowdown too. The PS3 is certainly good at some things. The Cell is great for physics operations. In many ways better than any current CPU, but its graphics card is severely lacking compared to those in modern PCs. Sorry kergeten, but you really don't know what you're talking about. |
One thing the Cell is great at, other than doing physics on its own w/o needing the GPU to do it, is figuring out what it doesn't have to send to the GPU at all, thereby sparing the GPU that load as well. Example: the Cell SPE's absolutely fly when asked to determine which polygons are on the back surfaces of figures, and therefore don't have to be drawn by the GPU. Cell (all because of the SPEs) blows away Pentiums and the Xenon at this...so while other GPUs are busy drawing polygons, many of which won't be visible to the player in each frame, RSX won't have to be doing that nearly as much IF a game is optimized well for Cell.
Cell, more than Intel/AMD/Xenon processors, can increase the power of the GPU it is paired with, especially considering the insane bandwith between the two when compared to PC setups.
So, your 8800GT vs. 7800GT analysis neglects a lot.
