| Zekkyou said: It's not a comparison though, like i said, it's just a reference point. It's directed at people who say MK8 is a graphical achievement. I'd agree MK8 has runs impressively, but DC shows what an actual graphical achievement is, and the kind off trade offs necessary to achieve it. You can't have both :p That's assuming MK8 is indeed 1080p/60fps. If it's actually still 720p/60fps then i'll be back to disappointment (720p/60fps is less resource intensive than 1080p/30fps from a flat view). |
I think the problem is that you view fps as the performance and AA, AF, and textures as graphics. In truth, they are all simultaneous part of both graphics and performance. 60 fps does make a game a graphical achievement. Using animation as an example, a still image of two different clips can be compared like
They are comparable, and you could say they both are graphically good looking but if you comapre them in motion
http://youtu.be/otmqBvuwkfg?t=20s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy0E-1MD0bw
Like animation, framerate is also a part of the graphical experience.
