ethomaz said:
Wait... what? I used Battlefield to say neither it can be considered the EA's CoD in reponse to guy that said that Titanfal is the EA's CoD... if I remembered about Medal of Honor then I will use it instead Battlefield. I didn't used Battlefield to downplay Titanfall... I used Battlefield (I forgot Medal of Honor is an EA game) to show how ridiculous this claim is "EA has been trying to have it's own COD for many years. Finally they got it, and they messed it up." After that you asked me a question and I awnsered it because I'm a really cool guy... but not satisfacted you entered in this console war to say I have an agenda to try to avoid the fact that my comments are on spot. My comments was clear since beggining and backup by numbers. The only comparision between game I did was "Neither Battlefield is a CoD, how can you say Titanfal is? Boom". |
Which is why I said to look at COD sales when it was still a new IP. Titanfall very much had/has the potential to be the next big thing in ther FPS market, but you're saying that it can't compare to COD (which only sold a small fraction at its inception of what it sells today) because it doesn't even sell as well as Battlefield (which is a massive shooter that you are downplaying the success of in an attempt to make Titanfall look worse.)
"After that you asked me a question and I awnsered it because I'm a really cool guy." Oh please lol. All you tried to do is spin in an effort to deny that a franchise that sells far more than GT isn't bigger than it. And we both know why.
You just said a couple posts ago that you are a PS fanboy, so I don't know why you're now trying to deny that you're using fanboy logic.
