Kane1389 said:
But you do know that this case isnt really a home invasion case nor even a self defence case, right? He set up a 'trap' with an intention to kill whoever stepped on his property. It's a premeditated murder. There was a case recently in Florida, in which a vietnam veteran shot 2 teen burglars dead even tho they were already incapacitaded from gunshot wounds and posed no further threat. The guy was recording his enitre home, hence why they were able to convict him of murder. This is the same basic concept |
German protests have focused on Montana's self defense laws in regards to home invasions. When they have the same laws.
It is a home invasion case. The big difference is that he invited the home invasion.
Which is why I'd EXPECT he'd get convicted assuming the prosecution presnts the evidence well..
Though that will rely mostly on the purse I imagine.
You can't really convict someone for planning to shoot home invaders, as that's why people buy guns for self defense. You can't really convict someone for leaving their garage door open.
It's the purse and the haidressesrs comments that they intentionally left it there as a lure that will be the big evidence pieces.
Without that, shooting someone on your property there to steal something, vs shooting someone who is activly fleeing you...
