wary-wallaroo said:
As I said before, yes MS funded the fame hence it's timed exclusiveness, that's reasonable since it was probably what they agreed on. But then MS moneyhatted it into being a full exclusives (or rather moneyhatted it to keep it of PS consoles). That's where the problem lies |
Do gamers wake up one day and figure out that video games are a business. There is no problem. MS and Sony are not charities and they do not fund anything unless they get something in return. Lets think this through. You fund a project for limited exclusivity. You see the project is well received and you offer a company full exclusive which benefits your platform and the other company takes the money. As a business, why would MS care for PS only gamers. If anything, they would want to make those PS only gamers become duel console owners.
In the end, you nor I really know exactly how the whole deal went down and what MS offered for full exclusitity. Hell, we do not know if MS had a clause when they funded the project if they could go full exclusive. It really comes down to the fact that MS funded the project and for the first game its exclusive to their platform. It saved the project and MS gained a solid FPS in the process.








