Max King of the Wild said:
No, you actually believed it. Shellie Zimmerman did. The original Judge on the case was shown to be biased against George and a commitee reassigned another Judge onto the case. Ironically, a sign of telling the truth. Variations in stories are expected each time it's told so your entire next point is invalid. |
If he was telling the truth, then he would have just given the same account of the event each and every time. The story wouldn't change.
He is either delusional & in denial killer, or he is lying.
Joseph Smith pulled the samething with the creation of the Mormon faith. Different variation each time he told the story to the publisher.
And Zimmerman was caught lying about many other things 100% red handed, like how much money he has. The guy clearly is a pathological liar.
Plus; what was George Zimmerman motive for following a young black male around, that he had suspected had stolen a few dollars worth of things from a liquor store?
Why would George Zimmerman care soo extremely much about a stolen slim Jim or skittles, or whatever he thought was stolen?
Plus, it turned out the dude didn't even stole anything. So he followed & killed the black teenager for nothing. Where were the weapons of mass destruction? (LOL, at Iraq pond)







