By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GribbleGrunger said:
J_Allard said:
GribbleGrunger said:
If you think Windwalker or Pikmin are good examples then you haven't got a clue what I'm on about.

Sounds like you don't know what art is.

Maybe the photo options in those games aren't as good, or maybe they are just photos people took of the actual games. Either way they are art, just like the Infamous shots.

I know exactly what I'm talking about because I'm the person who's trying to define it in a way people can undethrstand. You clearly don't understand what I'm saying so I've failed in my attempt.

I can post hundreds of screenshots of ISS without a problem, but that isn't what I'm talking about. There has to be a level of photorealism to achieve what I'm talking about. It's not about resolution or poly count, it's about taking real world photgraphic knowledge and applying it to Infamous. Those Pikmin pictures say nothing about the person that captured them.


You're literally contradicting yourself. It can't both "have a level of photorealism" and "not be about resolution or polycount." You can't have one without the other.

And if you seriously think that this:

...or this:

...says nothing about the photographer, then you either very obviously know nothing about photography or you're trying too hard to beleive that Infamous did it first. It didn't. Get over it.