| GribbleGrunger said: I know exactly what I'm talking about because I'm the person who's trying to define it in a way people can undethrstand. You clearly don't understand what I'm saying so I've failed in my attempt. I can post hundreds of screenshots of ISS without a problem, but that isn't what I'm talking about. There has to be a level of photorealism to achieve what I'm talking about. It's not about resolution or poly count, it's about taking real world photgraphic knowledge and applying it to Infamous. Those Pikmin pictures say nothing about the person that captured them. |
And who is to say people who took those photos didn't apply real world photo knowledge? And how in the world would you know whether or not those photos say anything about whoever took them? lol. They could be based off some real life experience for all you know. I mean please, enlighten us. What exactly do the photos in your OP "say" about who took them? I think most of those photos are beautiful. And I think most of the Pikmin ones are personal and beautiful as well. Don't try to speak in such absolutes about things so wildly open to interpretation.
