Why is it hard to believe that third parties are biased against Nintendo?

[S.T.A.G.E.]

impertinence said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

impertinence said:

Captain_Tom said:

Why is it so hard to believe that third parties have a very valid reason for avoiding Nintendo?

This oft repeated sentence is in itself a great example of bias.

He's right though, they have a valid reason.

A valid reason if you buy into the bias, sure. Anything can be a valid reason. "I don't want to" is a valid reason for anything, it is also heavily dependent on bias.

The statement "Third parties have a good reason to avoid Nintendo" is a steaming pile of confirmation bias.

Bias is prejudice of one thing or person over another. There is no prejudice if you want profit. Having no major market for your products isnt a bias.