Why is it hard to believe that third parties are biased against Nintendo?

[mysteryman]

Serious_frusting said:

mysteryman said:

noname2200 said:

He's assuming that everyone on this site can take the formula "1+x=2" and find x. Stupid of him, I know.

 

What kind of sorcery is this???



It's okay, He-Man the spoon is here to save us all

God forbid that someone makes a title that coninsides with the thread.  He just name droped Nintendo to get people to view his thread. Understandable really when you think about it after you see the op.

 

I am not the only one who thinks this because everyone who has commented has been talking nintendo. So they have been answering his thread title and not the tripe thats in op. Sorry thats just my opinion. One of the worst threads he has ever made, Why cant the title be Why is it so hard to believe 3rd parties are biased?  or better still 'that 3rd parties can be biased'. 

Maybe because he knew people would not care about his thread else? Just a thought.

The use of non-Nintendo examples of bias in the industry was to circumvent anti-Nintendo blinkers. Of course this meant that some insight was required to appreciate the message. Clearly this was asking too much.

 

Dont worry though, here comes the aeroplane:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6251599