JPL78 said:
My view is that if I'm going to have a console for 5-8 years then I would like it to be as powerful as possible. There is no down side to that. |
That's a significantly different scenario, though. Gen 6 was so lopsided in favor of the PS2 that despite being more powerful, Xbox just didn't get as many games. Yea, sports games, Soul Calibur 2, and late multiplat releases (GTA and MGS2 come immediately to mind) looked better on Xbox, but when Final Fantasy/Kingdom Hearts, Tekken, MGS3, Devil May Cry, etc. never touched the console, power comparisons don't matter. You can have the most powerful console, but it doesn't mean anything when it doesn't have the games to back it up. There was no "sharing 95% of the same library" in gen 6 between PS2 and Xbox. Such a comparison only became relevant between PS3 and 360 because they shared so many games, and it looks like it'll be that way this gen too.
For example, I could have that $9600 Mac that blows everything out the water, but there's no point when most of Steam's games are only on PC.








