Why is a quality low budget game inherintly worse than a crappy high budget game? Seriously this is one of the most annoying things about the industry today. I'd much rather play a Phoenix Wright game than Lost Planet. Just because a game costs 10 times as much to make doesn't make it 10 times as good.
Were all your favorite games high budget? Halo, Daikatana, and Killzone? Why do people have any confidence in Resident Evil 5 when Capcom lost the entire development team who left with Clover?
And if we aren't talking about your favorites, but instead talking about major support, how is canceling a PS3 exclusive that was already in development and making it a Wii exclusive NOT major support? Especially for the single biggest Japanese franchise Capcom has, and yes, it's among my top 10 games this year.
If you are complaining about lack of support from their Western development teams, just remember that their western dev teams suck. Lost Planet 2 isn't on Wii. Wii is doooooomeed!
And you're still ignoring the fact that all the games you're complaining about have been in development more than 2 years. Even if let's say Capcom decided the Wii was a strong system for Resident Evil after RE4 hit 1 million, we wouldn't even see that game announced until TGS this year at the earliest.
So pick your argument. Are we talking about a lack of games that appeal to you or a lack of strong market support?
I'm not arguing that Capcom hasn't put the budget into the Wii that they have into the 360 and PS3, but that's one of the advantages of the Wii! Only on the Wii would a great game like Zack & Wiki be given a chance. If all you wanted to play were shitty FPS games, the Wii was the wrong console to buy.
PS: Seeds Inc. became PlatinumGames and retains all the lead developers from Clover Studios along with Shinji Mikami of Resident Evil fame and much of the original programming staff.
