spemanig said:
You people may be used to and enjoy games that run and look like shit, but I'm not and it's got to stop. No offense, but if you seriously think that more games that reinforce how much more inferior the Wii U's hardware is to it's competitors is a better idea, then you're missing some screws upstares. |
You do realize that you just explained in your own post why this would be a horrible idea? The other versions will always be better and the Wii U version will always sell like shit compared to them, this is why your idea doesn't work. This plan of yours would not ensure higher quality of third party games, it would only ensure that the last few third party games disappear. No developer in his right mind would sign a contract like this for a version of his game, that he knows will sell vastly worse than all other versions, when he's not even sure that this will make sales of that version better, cause as you said the Wii U is the last place people play third party on (that and most people don't even care for the stuff you mentioned very much).
If Nintendo wants higher quality ports for their console then they have to make that console sell better, make it a more viable platform for developers, not demand that developers make better ports, they're in no position to do that and btw. one important part of achieving better hardware sales would be better third party support, cause believe it or not the only reason third party games do so bad on Wii U is because only hardcore Nintendo fans bought the system and one of the reasons for that is that there are hardly any games outside of Nintendos stuff.
Regarding your last paragraph, I will just ignore this petty jab at my sanity and say that every game that releases on Wii U reinforces how much inferior the hardware is. Why? Because the hardware just is tha inferior and it's not third parties job to somehow hide that power difference.