By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shadow1980 said:
benao87 said:

Wtf, I not reading all that.

It is invalid, I never said it wasn't. I'm just referring to your wording, it is not "completely invalid".

"Wall of text"? Really? It's just three short paragraphs. It took me all of two minutes to read it. What is with people responding anything longer than a Tweet with things like "wall of text" or "I'm not reading a novel" or "TL;DR"? A handful of paragraphs is hardly War and Peace. Sorry, but that's a really freakin' big pet peeve of mine when people react negatively to anything longer than a single paragraph.

First of all, thanks for the great posts. It's nice to see someone putting some effort to provide evidence and back up their claims instead of replying as if they're tweeting , as you said (not referring to anyone in particular). 

I too strongly dislike the whole "tl;dr" attitude. Having said that, bena has a point. The comparison is invalid, but not completely invalid. It's not comparing animals with oranges, but it's more like apples and oranges. Invalid, but not completely invalid.