zorg1000 on 10 April 2014
| gamemaster4747 said: Incorrect on releasing a broken game and then sending out patches. I would rather wait longer for a complete and well working game. However, correct on Nintendo's arrogance! They insult us with last gen tech with more ram and give us a giant ugly pad with no option to play with a second one? Worse is the high price they are charging for Wii U and for the 3DS! It only costs a little over 100 dollars to make a regular 3DS, but they charge 169? The fact that Nintendo hasn't shaved 100 dollars off the Wii U is an rrogant factor. No true 3D Mario at launch and taking forever to develop Zelda, like they have all of eternity to release it? Arrogant is correct. They may pay the price for it. |
Ur post implies u dont like the "giant ugly pad" so why would u want a 2nd one? Nintendo hasnt shaved $100 dollars off the Wii U not because they are arrogant but because they would lose billions of dollars by doing so considering the fact that it already is sold at a loss and they arent arrogant for pricing 3DS at $169, its selling very well so clearly people dont have a problem with it plus there is a $129 sku available if $169 is too much. By that logic Microsoft is arrogant because 360 hasnt had a price cut in over 5 years and is sold at a profit. No true 3D Mario at launch? We might as well critisize Sony for not having a Naughty Dog game at launch or Microsoft for not having Halo 5 at launch. Would u rather have them rush Zelda and affect its quality? The Zelda team has released Skyward Sword in 2011 and Link Between Worlds in 2013, I guess Zelda U could be out by now if they decided to neglect Wii or 3DS. Nintendo has made many mistakes lately but ur post is just wrong or doesnt make sense.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.







