pezus said:
Ronster316 said:
pezus said:
Ronster316 said:
pezus said:
Ronster316 said:
As a franchise........... Dead Rising>>>> Infamous.
Infamous came out at a time when ps4 owners were STARVING for a new game, no doubt that has had an influence on Infamous sales. (a fair few buying it who would have otherwise waited for a second hand copy)
Still, more ps4's floating about out there than there are X1's, so thats helped a lot too. |
Uhm, wat. DR1 sold just 2m. DR2 managed 2.7m on PS3 and 360 combined.
Compare this to inFAMOUS 1 which sold 2.7m and 2 which sold 1.7m but was included in PS Plus for a long time.
And now we're looking at SS outselling DR3.
I don't see how DR>>>>>>>>>infamous...lol
|
Franchise........ not sales.
Besides, 3rd party game never bundled vs 1st party game thats been bundled left, right and center throughout its trilogy.
Also, regarding Dead Rising 1 v Infamous 1........... 360 had been out only a mere year when Dead Rising came out, ps3 was 3 years old when Infamous hit
|
Franchise?? Is that a measurement? I'm not sure what you're actually saying.
Oh, spare me your bundle reasoning, please. This will lead us nowhere.
|
Bundled at individual shops discretion vs official bundles available in every shop............ pull the other one man.
|
As I said...
What about my question? I don't get your franchise comment
|
For me, Dead Rising as a franchise/brand and particularly as a game>>>> Infamous.
Thats what i mean.
Also...... those Dead Rising "bundles" were more like tiny discounts, allow me to elaborate.........
XBOX ONE was £429 here in the UK originally, but you could find some Dead Rising "bundles" for £459.
So really, is it even a bundle? if anything you were just getting £10 knocked off Dead Risings price and getting it for £30 as opposed to £40.
