footbag said:
I'm going to disagree with this. If a scientist finds himself relying on faith. Or as in science they call it a hypothesys. He does all he can to test and disprove it. Wh he is thoroughly convince his hypothesys is correct, he publishes a paper including a repeatable experiment. This allows all of the scientific community to test his theory so they don't have to rely on faith.  Faith is useless in science because it is not testable. |
there are quite a few examples of science theories that didn't have any practical/observable evidence. a german scientist called boltzmann (spelling might be wrong) suggested the exsistence of the atom and he wrote some theories on the atom. there was no observable evidence for the atom at the time and he got laughed at so much he commited suicide.Â
Anyway if your going to say that God exists and that he created the universe you have to have some evidence because afterall the creation of the universe is about as sciency as science gets!Â








