By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
TheBlackNaruto said:
fatslob-:O said:

Nobody here is acting defensive from my side ... It's a known fact that value is determined by consumers. You really can't analyse by price but rather you have to do it by market demand. 


In which you are correct hence the reason I said it boils down to opinion. BUT looking at the side by side without taking ANYTHING else into consideration. Just the price of what is shown for the TF bundle and the PS4 MONENTARY value wise (not sure if I used that correctly lol) the TF XB1 bundle has the better value.

But the consumers still prefer the PS4 which again is fine no one is denying that from what I can see.

But why can't I make the claim that value is not dependent on price ? You can clearly see that price has little to do with the true meaning of value ... Monetary value has little meaning if consumers don't acknowledge the product. 

That's the thing though you can make that claim hence the reason I said you were correct as well lol. That does not make the article wrong going by just price which is what the article was saying basically. Not that the XB1 was better or anything just the value PRICE ALONE was a better deal. Again I say does that mean it is a better value to me as a consumer? No because I like the PS4 and what it has to offer better.

I think the confuse is people are seeing it as value as just one thing when there is consumer value which it is the PS4 and then the article is talking about just in price which means the XB1. Neither IS WRONG



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23