Einsam_Delphin said:
As we've already went over, it was an official price cut, no ifs or buts about it. I've only ever said it may aswell not be a price cut, due to it not changing much, not that it isn't a price cut at all. A similar example, even though it is clearly a console, I didn't consider the Wii U much of one at first because it had no games I was interested in. Now if you still can't understand this then there's nothing more I can do for ya. |
U missed the point, u said 2 things that contradict each other.
1. The first price cut didnt help it outsell Gamecube so a 2nd one wont
2. It was a price cut in name only and went from $300 to $300 so nothing was going to change
U admit the price cut was meaningless since it didnt actually lower the base price yet u say it didnt work so future ones wont either, that makes no sense.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.







