inFamous: Second Son Review Thread

[S.T.A.G.E.]

Fusioncode said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

lucidium said:

jlmurph2 said:
Ouch on that Rev3 review. Inb4 people calling Adam Sessler a joke.

Not to be devils advocate here, but he has consistently shown a clear bias for quite some time now.

I wouldn't called Sessler biased in the respect of what he finds to be at odds with InFamous: Second Sons story. He seems to know what hes talking about when he comes to progression, character relationships and more.

He clearly had no problems with Titanfall's half-assed story, so yes I'd say he's a bit biased. 

Titanfall is pretty much all gameplay. InFamous is a storybased games where your actions lead should have visible or at least omenous weight on the story. I'll have the game tomorrow so I can speak further on it. InFamous is still a must have, but it lacks qualities in a story that should be responsive to your actions. InFamous has always had slight issues in the story even though the story was well above average. They need to learn how to tie in the weight of your actions more. Titanfall soars where its focus is based on and that is multiplayer gameplay.