sales2099 said:
Well 1st it was $400m for the Pro in 2005 with the 20 gig hardrive. That alone played the same games as a PS3, and in the case of multiplats, played better versions. In short, the core experience was not only $200 cheaper, but superior. And Not only was it $50 for Gold at the time, disregarding sales that are year round and easy tot ake advantage of., the quality of service was far superior then anything PSN offered until several years after PS3 launched. |
All this is true, but doesn't change the fact that yes, in order to have a 360 that did close to what a PS3 could do, you had to spend more than the asking price of a PS3. And even if you did. Even if you bought ALL that shit, you were still stuck with analog output.