Kresnik said:
|
outlawauron said:
Why does that matter? The cost of the game never inlfuences the content of the game. I think you should review it for what it is rather than putting each in their own box.
|
Because if a game is something that would be a "good purchase as a £15 title but a complete ripoff for £40" (see, for example, something like Dungeon Hunter: Alliance or Ridge Racer Vita) then I would want to know that in the review. I wouldn't want to be told that they're both perfectly serviceable games with good dungeon crawling/racing mechanics respectively (which they both are) and then have nothing else said about them.
|
That goes without saying. Games that you're interested in, but don't seem to be very good (scored 4-6 range) are understood to not be worth their full value. You wait until they're cheaper before purchasing. It doesn't need to reach a magic pricepoint to become worth playing, it just wasn't very good and wouldn't be economically sound.