Mystro-Sama said:
oniyide said:
Mystro-Sama said:
oniyide said:
Mystro-Sama said:
oniyide said:
Mystro-Sama said:
No. It's stupid because they announced both versions simultaneously. They could have easily made the Wii U version first to bolster hardware sales then announce and release the 3ds version a couple months later. |
and how would that benefit gamers?
|
I didn't say it was a benefit to gamers. I'm just saying it would make a lot of sense from a business standpoint since this game could singlehandedly save the Wii U. And the 3ds already has a massive library of games.
|
No you are really hyping up smash this game in no way can single handedly save the Wii U it didnt do it for n64, Gc or wii but i guess this is where we see a difference and ill agree to disagree.
|
How am I over hyping it when it sells millions every generation? GTA helped the PSP alot and so does Pokemon games for Nintendo handhelds. The point is smash could easily boost hardware sales and put Nintendo in a better position.
|
your overhyping by saying it could "save" Wii u. Yes it will boost HW, but there is no saving Wii U IMHO
|
It could have very well done that. The last smash sold over 12 mil. And i'm pretty sure people said the ps3 couldn't be saved. You're just way too negative towards thing. Someone with your mindset could never run a company.
|
I could do it better than you IMHO, I actually look at reality and not wish thinking. THe last one sold on a console that had an install base of 100 MILLION, the wii was already flying off the shelves long before Brawl hit the stores. People bought Smash because the had a Wii not the other way around. Did Melee save GC? nope and Wii U is doing worse than that. PS3 only problem was price something Wii U cant say. Im glad ninty isnt throwing their eggs in one Smash Wii U basket or else they would have been in trouble.
