The truth about Nintendo

[Zod95]

Viper1 said:

Zod95 said:

Viper1 said:

Then why did you ask?  Either you were asking because you didn't know or as I first stated, it wasn't a question but a declarative statement with a tagged question on the end.

Because I'm not an expert about Nintendo

and I wanted to know your opinion about whether we should count Rare as Nintendo or not.

Finally, something we agree upon.  Perhaps you should consider this in relation to your original post and its premise....to which I've refuted several pages ago and you've yet to address.

As for counting Rare as Nintendo, of course we should.  They owned a controlling interest, which in business terms means ownership.  Therefore it is irrelevant whether the ideas, coding or technical prowess came from Kyoto or Twycross, England. 

I have been quite busy these days and my ability to respond to all the posts addressed to me has been low (as you can see). But if you post it again here I promise I will try to answer it. Maybe you could eliminate the points that were already discussed in the meanwhile.