Soundwave said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
I wouldn't be mad, I'd be sad that Nintendo's gonna lose even more money after this thing sells even worse than the Wii U. I mean really, other than sell worse, the only other thing this does different from Wii U is change third party reasoning for not putting games on the system to it's install base compared to PS4/X1 rather than it's specs. |
Waive the licensing fees for the first year. That would get a lot of attention from third parties if the system is basically a PC GPU. What's Nintendo really got to lose here anyway, they're not getting games like Kingdom Hearts III and FFXV on the Wii U as is, so waiving the devleopment fee or say dropping it to $0 on the first 400,000 copies of any game also gives third parties a very low risk option to explore.
That's a business model third parties can understand, the Wii U is one that makes no sense to them. |
Yeah they might explore it, just like they did with the Wii U, then they'll back off again once their games don't sell. Now seeing as the majority buy Nintendo consoles for Nintendo games, the real problem with this thing is from what you said, this new system and the Wii U will have the same games, hence the new system is doomed to sell less than the Wii U as it'll be much cheaper and have an already established base by the time this thing comes out.
