By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
rolltide101x said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
rolltide101x said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Panama said:
Honestly depends on reviews. If Shadowfall was on 80+ meta it sure as hell wouldn't be struggling to surpass KZ2 and 3 on a system that currently has a limited library but is selling like hotcakes.


I would easily give the game an 8.5 from all that i've played. The story has some issues, but is good overall but the multiplayer needs more choices of guns. Outside of that its great. Definitely better than COD for sure. The only game better than it is Battlefield until Titanfall comes out. Sony has covered their launch very well.


I give KZ:SF an 7.5. It is crap compared to KZ2 and KZ3 imo (single player and multiplayer)


Based on the total package if the multiplayer and small story elements were fixed it would've been a nine or over for me. I had to take off two and a half points. Its AAA for sure.

KZ: SF feels like a "zombie" that took elements from other games. It does not even feel like Killzone anymore. If Sony is not going to make Killzone something original they need to kill the series and get GG working on a new IP.


Can you blame Guerilla for having to do that? The way they used to do things wasn't working. They needed to increase the demand for Killzone. The multiplayer from a run and gun standpoint is great. It just needs the other Killzone hallmarks like Jetpacks, Mechs and the crazy awesome guns in KZ2. They also need to increase the customizable nature of your characters.