The truth about Nintendo

[Zod95]

sundin13 said:

Once again, you are using the word "evolved" terribly wrong.

Also...

Also? The sentence before was an argument by itself?

 

sundin13 said:

Also, Instruments were introduced at about the same time vocals were in video games ... As soon as technology allowed using recorded sounds, both vocals and instruments were utilized.

How can you make that statement?! Ok, I will give you the chance of showing evidence about that. Do you have it?

 

sundin13 said:

Prior to that it was all digital. Therefore, by using your own logic (which is HIGHLY flawed), instruments in music are equally evolved as lyrics, with both being more evolved than digital music (including digital lyrics). As soon as technology allowed using recorded sounds, both vocals and instruments were utilized.

What difference do you make between digital and non-digital?

 

sundin13 said:

I'm not going to bother delving into the 2D vs 3D evolution debate because it is basically a matter of semantics.

2D and 3D are a matter of semantics?! Are you feeling ok?

 

sundin13 said:

Also, once again, you aren't showing how this in any way villifies Nintendo or this should be seen as a negative. You can talk about effort but I think its fairly undeniable that Nintendo does and always has put a lot of effort into their soundtracks...

This doesn't vilify anyone and you can see it the way you want it. But facts are facts, that's what the OP is focused on. And the fact is that Nintendo games, in general, shifted to vocal music later than their competitors.

How do you show to any person that it's "fairly undeniable" that Nintendo puts a lot of effort into their soundtracks?