Einsam_Delphin said:
zorg1000 said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
zorg1000 said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
I don't even need the Gamecube as an example, as the current sales tell all! Cheaper price is doing zilch for Wii U. It's even being outsold by a console that's $200 more expensive, $250 if you count it's lack of a pack in game. And let's not forget how it was selling just as badly even when the PS4/XO didn't exist yet! |
So if u think being cheaper is doing zilch for Wii U than u believe it would be selling the same amount it currently is even if it was the same price as PS4/One.
|
Good sir you clearly have no idea what idea I believe in! |
U just said it, zilch means nothing. if being cheaper is doing nothing for Wii U that means it would be selling at its current pace even if it wasnt cheaper.
|
Nope, nowhere did I say "Wii U would sell the same if priced the same PS4/XO," and zilch was an obvious exaggeration and I'm sure you knew what I ment, but you're just nitpicking so you have something to go on about.  |
I was hoping u would say that. So if zilch was an exaggeration than u believe that being cheaper is helping Wii U to a certain extent. So if being $100 cheaper is somewhat helping Wii U than why wouldnt being $200 cheaper help it even more?