The ironic thing is that many of those points are more true than not true. What the OP has done here is a classic case of appeal to riducule.
And those two games that were mentioned (Xenoblade and Monster Hunter) were developed by which studios exactly? And do you have many other examples like these?
The truth is that there is (at least) a little reality in perception. What games did PS360/PC gamers enjoy over the last 7 years? Mass Effect, Bioshock, Gears, Dragon Age, Souls series, Uncharted etc. etc. Games like Modnation Racers were not the poster-boy games of the HD gaming era. No, there were massive sprawling worlds like Skyrim and GTA4&5 to explore. The Batman series became extremely accomplished, standing toe-to-toe with anything on Nintendo hardware. How many should I mention? Are you saying that Nintendo's games are not cheaper to develop compared to what is on the competition's hardware?
If I misunderstood this parody then I apologize. But if it is a sly attempt to reimburse Nintendo fans with the belief that their videogame provider of choice is standing on top of the world then I need to point out that they are very, very far away from that.
I do not wish to propose how they could possibly evolve to become as relevant as you want them to be.







