Kasz216 said:
It's funny how much of a colonialist view you have there. There are plenty of countries that have been warless that haven't fully developed, often because a lot of areas within countries don't want to "develop".
Outside that.... You can't fund infrastructure and factories until you have security. That should be basic common sense. and the Afghan forces aren't capable of creating that needed security. |
The way Afghanistan was progressing before war kicked off, it would of been like a western country. This would've been by choice. No one forced them to do that. All these wars changed things though and now the fundamentalists are holding it all back. I'm not saying they should be like us, but alot of stuff like that is acceptable here was happening there.
'Development' not only means improving economy but the change in society to make it better for themselves. I don't know what is colonialist about that. But obviously, that is not Afghanistan anymore.
The Afghanistan we see now has gone backwards and faces many problems that the west can't deal with for them. They need to want to improve their society away from the volatile and dangerous Taliban, which is what seems to cause alot of the ongoing issues. It's like an endless cycle now.
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030







