| BMaker11 said: Well, Rocksteady made Asylum and City and those games were phenomenal. It may feel "played out" because WB Montreal made Origins (not Rocksteady), and, based on all the reviews I've seen for the game, they didn't "push the series forward" and they just rehashed Arkham City. We have precedent that Rocksteady makes excellent Batman games, so the sour taste left in your mouth from Origins should not carry over to Rocksteady making Arkham Knight |
I actually haven't played Arkham Origins, so I'm basing that on the biennialization of the series and the fact that Arkham City left me strangely cold. I know I'm in the minority there, and it is certainly a very impressive game in many ways, but it was a pretty terrible open world game IMO. It felt like they decided to just take Arkham Asylum and make it bigger ("double the collectibles = double the fun, right?!"), but that didn't really translate well for me.
