By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KBG29 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
MB1025 said:
leo-j said:
I can't with ppl who played a beta that barely runs in HD standing by this game.. Which looks barely on par if anything with killzone on the ps3


So how come peolpe stand by KillZone? It looks pretty, but sucks at everything else?

Actually as a person who loves FPS KZ has great multiplayer. It has actually risen the bar for their franchise. Only problem is that this KZ doesnt just yet have the jet packs and mechs.Story aside the multiplayer really is the greatest part about this game.

Personally, I think KZ:SF is a step back. The good thing about it is ~60fps which makes it play much better than any PS3 Killzone. But, lets not forget that Killzone 3 did have Mechs and Jet packs. I think had PS3 been the dominate online console last gen KZ2 and KZ3 multiplayer would be talked about much more highly. They honestly were doing the stuff that Titanfall is being praised for all the way back in 2011, and they did it with 24 player support.


I agree but they could always add mechs and jetpacks with the new DLC.