| Veknoid_Outcast said: PS+ is a great service, but I don't think the formula would work for Nintendo. Nintendo's first-party software typically sells long after release at full or near-full price. So Nintendo would probably lose money if it offered its best-selling games for $50 a year, for example. The same is true for the Virtual Console games. Nintendo can charge high prices for its legacy games because they remain popular 15, 20, 30 years later. |
There won't be a 15 years later if they don't start moving Wii Us now. I'm not talking a subscription, I'm talking one off bundles of software that appears to be valuable but actually most people bought already before/wouldn't buy individually now/functions as a demo for upcoming Wii U sequels.







