By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Max King of the Wild said:
Samus Aran said:

And I said most decent games on PS3/4 don't have local multiplayer, they mostly rely on online multiplayer or singleplayer. Which is true. So yes, it matter if the game is of good quality and not just some mediocre game. I hope you're not paying $570 to play some mediocre games. 

I think it's safe to say that most people that are buying a PS4 this early can be considered Sony fans. Wii is a different story. N64 and GC sold way less than the Wii, so yes the Wii sold to more than just fans because of the fad of motion control and Wii Sports. PS1 and PS2 had big userbases(so did PS3, eventually).

So your opinion is fact now? Got it. Because I played Knack and Rayman with my wife since critics opinion of knack was mediocre and rayman wasnt exclusive than I shouldnt have enjoyed them with my wife. Do you realize how asinine your comment was yet?


But why did you spend so much money on a new console just to play Knack and Rayman Legends(which is available on basically every console)? Wasn't it better to wait for better games and perhaps a pricedrop(not very likely seeing as how good it's selling). That's something I don't understand, hence my posts here. 

My opinion isn't fact, but if I didn't think my opinion was true then it wouldn't be my opinion now would it? 

I'm not just saying this because I'm a Nintendo fan because I didn't think the Wii U was worth the purchase when it was €350 with the only exclusive a 2D Mario game. I waited till the Wind Waker HD bundle was €280(a game I never played) before buying the Wii U. This saved me more than €170(because the launch games I bought were a lot cheaper as well now).