The truth about Nintendo

[Zod95]

Anfebious said:
I find it funny that you say that your thread wasn't with the intention of causing havoc. Because I think that's the purpose of it, you just hide it behind rational arguments and "facts".

I have to agree with you though, this thread is out of hand and there is no way you will be able to reply to all those posts. It's like you want people to change their perception of Nintendo and that just won't happen, you can reply and reply and reply but they won't change their views about Nintendo.

You can't shove your OP into our throats and expect us to swallow it. I feel somewhat ashamed that you where called a potential journalist.

The most hilarious thing is that you are leaving this thread like this, saying: "I won because my arguments can't be proven wrong". Of course we can't zod95, you always reply, and you always twist things, you can't win a match against a wall.

If you want to say you won, then so be it, you won. Nintendo is a horrible company, it just makes low budget games and they are a cancer to the industry.

I haven't won, and I told you that. Neither Nintendo's reputation was adjusted according to Nintendo's real actions nor those actions were proven to be wrong and thus get adjusted according to Nintendo's reputation. The chasm continues to exist.

I didn't try to make anyone swallow the OP and I asked many times for people to prove me wrong. But see what they want me to swallow: Nintendo never tried to create an environment of exclusivity because of a very limited amount software that wasn't even produced by them and that was just part of a promotional move.

Sometimes I feel it's about a fight between my rationality and your love for Nintendo.