|
Zod95 said:
As a fan of videogaming, what matters to me is that this industry produces high-quality games. That's what really matters. But quality is about how much a game is appreciated by each person. Then, it varies from gamer to gamer, because it is about tastes. Talking about tastes is going around in circles, it's not possible to argue on this field. .
|
This is largely why this will be my last post in this topic. This thread is largely about tastes, including your OP, so we're really just going to keep running around in circles.
The only contention I have with this thread is the skewing of the "facts" to argue truth. If this was an opinion piece, this thread would have a completely different landscape.
|
Zod95 said:
These real people were rendered to the game, did all the action scenes to capture their movements and did their own voices too. This whole process demanded a lot of time, interviews, cinematic preparation, performances, etc. But the end result was absolutely remarkable: an immersive game like no other on the 6th generation.
|
I know your trying hard to be objective, but this statement rather subjective to be honest.They might have put a lot of effort into that game, but frankly I thought the game itself was rather mediocre overall, certainly not very immersive for me... We're somehow talking about tastes now.
And let's discuss immersion for a second. It happens many different ways... When I think of immersive games, for me I think of games like Mass Effect, Fallout, or Legend of Zelda... I could go into great detail why I think those games are immersive, but again immersion forms off of our subjective interests, so it's rather irrelevant.
|
Zod95 said:
Like the OP says, they have always avoided what is massive money spending, monsters of uncontrolled quality, bold concepts that could become state-of-the-art achievements. Nintendo games are nothing more than small and conventional fun experiences that can only be praised on a subjective analysis. Objectively, they are a nullity.
|
Honestly, I can't get over how rediculous this statement is... Again this is largely your opinion.
|
Zod95 said:
Not my criteria. As I said earlier, I disregard my tastes or the tastes of anybody else when talking about quality in a forum full of different people that have different perceptions of quality. Instead, I use objective criteria (universal truth) not to assess quality but to try to estimate it. You may find it good or bad, but it is indeed an estimation based on facts, not tastes. And even if you don't connect commitment to quality, that's fine, don't call it quality, call it commitment. The section 1.2 of the OP shows how commited Nintendo has been along the time.
|
We're just going to have to agree to disagree...
