Zod95 said:
The OP doesn't say what Nintendo must do, only what they have done. Personally, I find that gameplay-focus argument a fallacy. Nintendo only invests on cheap gameplay. Not cheap like bad, the games are fun. Cheap in the sense that is really easy to do what they do once you have their talent. Open-world is expensive, simulating physics is expensive, non-linear story telling is expensive, stochastic-animations-based gameplay is expensive, complex artificial intelligence is expensive, etc. Nintendo does none of that. And I'm only talking about gameplay, not graphics. I, as a gamer, don't care much about graphics. Gameplay and content are what matters to me. And I would never buy a Nintendo console precisely because they only have cheap gameplay. |
Cheap? Nintendo mastered the 3D movement with Mario 64. Non-linear story telling? Animations based gameplay? You mean press X to win?
Did you ever play Mario Galaxy? DKCR? Smash? Mario Kart? Xenoblade? Zelda? Banjo? Fzero? star fox? I guess not since you said they only invest in cheap gameplay... Open world, simulated physics and advanced graphics does not equal better games. Could Nintendo take advantage of that? Most likely, however it is amazing how making games with symple (I am calling it cheap, since you are really afraid to say what you think) gameplay they manage to outsell the competition by several million units...
Menx64
3DS code: 1289-8222-7215
NNid: Menx064








