| Zod95 said: No, most of it are facts and arguments based on facts. One thing that you and many other people are not getting is that the OP is a collection of facts gathered in a way that it passes a certain message. You may challenge the selection of the facts, you may challenge the way they are organized, you may even challenge the message (which is the end result of them all). But you cannot challenge them. They are facts. If you think otherwise, then please find in the whole OP one single paragraph that is not at least backed up by facts.
I have already accepted a lot of critics and different ways of thinking regarding the OP. But I will not accept what I find to be wrong.
No, I just don't want people to call opinions to facts or biased comments to neutral insights, and to do it on purpose just to unfairly protect their god company. I want an honest and transparent forum where people don't just say "you make silly arguments" or "you are a joke account". Instead, people are willing to openly debate what's on the table, giving arguments and backing them with evidences/facts, and put the truth ahead of any personal preference. |
No one is trying to protect Nintendo.. Who is trying to protect them? Please point them out. Everyone is simply pointing out that your argument are not ALL FACTS as you say.
You are not willingly open to debate that. To you, we are just trying to prtoect them. And you keep insulting us with your constant redirects to the OP like we're a bunch of idiots that don't understand it. It is full of opinions and twists and you keep denying it and when someone else brings up a valid point you say nonsense things like: "farmville is innovation".
It's like you only want to debate if it ends with us all agreeing cheerfully that Nintendo is the bigger evil of the 3. Completely disregarding what the other companies have done in the past that have harmed gamers.
I can see now, there is no debating with you. You are not open to anything but discontent towards nintendo.
