Zod95 said:
Most of it are facts. The rest is backed up by facts too. Why should I tell that Nintendo's policies like region lock or inventory management are not real, just my opinion? |
Just your opinion.
1.1 - "Some of you may tell that companies are meant to make profits and thus it’s totally legitimate for Nintendo to make billions at the gamer’s expense. That is true. However, you as a gamer have the power to choose. If there are companies that have been willing to give you as much as you give them, you can opt by them and make the market to operate on this logic. That is also fair".
Your opinion. When you buy a game, you buy a game. Nobody cares if Microsoft or Sony or Nintendo will be happy with my purchase. If I bought a game is because I just want to play it. Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo owe nothing to me. I bought because I want, because I like it. End.
1.2 - You use so many times the word "complex". Just because Nintendo games are not "photo realistics" does NOT mean they aren't "complex". Smash Bros has a gameplay years ahead of Mortal Kombat or Tekken, you like or not. And what about sports? And cartoonish thing? A game don't need to be gray and have 500 blood barrels to be "complex". I love to kill some people on CoD sometimes, but is funny and "complex" just biuld my city on Animal Crossing.
1.3 - So many assumptions here that I'm going to skip
1.4 - If you wasted your time searching like you said you probably knew about the crash in 1984, so pointless. But I agree that region locking is stupid.
2.1 - Yes, you never made a research. Go and read something about the crash.
"Nintendo has always preferred money over product spread and has always attempted for market dominance by means of intimidation and dirty moves towards gamers, retailers and, in this case, developers."
I just have to lol at this. Sony, Microsoft, EA, Ubisoft etc do the same thing. Deal with it.
2.2 - I agree that using nini-dvds and cartriges was stupid, but "Sony and Microsoft have always attempted to develop powerful consoles using mainstream hardware tech that could please and be accessible to as many 3rd parties as possible, which could aim for protagonism within the console. Actually, Sony and Microsoft enhanced it, providing good software development tools and eventually financing some projects if they were to be exclusives. Their philosophy was: “if we develop the best system for 3rd party developers, it can’t be bad for our 1st party studios”. No man, just no. PS2, PS3 and original Xbox want to talk with you.
And using anonymous source and saying Wii was safe, you just make sure nobody take you serious.
2.3 - No.
2.4 - No again
3.1 and on - Just your opinion, everything useless and no facts.
Conclusion: You don't like Nintendo and I'm ok with this, but don't call truth and facts about your opinion
