Zod95 said:
bolded: wrong, I've never claimed such a thing and Nintendo is not the best prepared for the future among the 3 console makers. underlined: how can you claim such a thing? |
You wanna see the big list of bankrupted devs last gen. It's at something like 50. Not to mention the ones like David Jaffe who went Free to play and Irrational who went indie.
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2012/12/11/20-studios-we-lost-in-2012
Theres a list of 20 for 2012, who went were disolved into other groups because their games didn't make a profit anymore in todays development environment. Or various other reasons which can all be traced to massive development costs that are skewering the variety of games that developers can make money off of.
And how is my statement wrong. Nintendo is trying to make console development about the depth of gameplay instead of the pixel count in graphics. You know how much the most expensive games costs these days? GTAV is the number 1 at 265 million dollars. Can you imagine if that failed? If suddenly people just said "I'm tired of GTA". There are less people who play games on a home console than there were 10 years ago, and our development costs have gone through the roof, how is this not evidence that graphics don't work.